PETA's Breasts Hypocrisy: Pamela Anderson Has No Problem Pumping Her Breasts Up With Chemicals

Yummy, let's eat!

PETA's latest skin campaign for animal rights has Pamela Anderson marked for slaughter. They seem to be running out of ideas for pimping women's bodies for their animal rights campaigns.

By the way, while Anderson doesn't believe chemicals shouldn't be used to plump the breasts of poultry, she has no problem using chemicals to plump her own up. Just an observation. Take it for what it's worth.

I guess what's good for Pamela Anderson financially isn't good for McDonald's and their Chicken nuggets. While I don't advocate pumping food with chemicals to produce plump breasts in animals like chickens and turkeys in half the time, isn't it irony that Pamela Anderson has made millions pumping up her own breasts with chemicals?

Seriously, is Pamela Anderson really the best choice for an ad campaign that asks people to consider how chemicals on factory farms are changing animals? Or is she being used by PETA for the chemical enhancements in her own body hoping you don't see the irony?

Not to mention, have you ever seen this woman without the chemicals she puts on her face? Geez?

It's all chemicals. So why isn't what is good for Pamela Anderson not good for animals? Just curious...