Content

Let's Hope Barack Obama is the First Billion-Dollar Loser: The Absurd Cost of Buying the Presidency

Lew Rockwell has an interesting piece that shows the absurdity of American politics these days. It is being predicted that to win the presidency in 2012, you are going to have to raise a billion dollars. Now remember it was Barack Obama who pushed closer to this absurd number in 2008. Four years later they are predicting we will break the billion dollar campaign. Let's hope if this is true, Barack Obama in the first Billion-Dollar Loser.


The pundits are saying that the Democrats will spend a billion dollars to get Obama re-elected in 2012. That means that the Republicans will do their best to raise a billion dollars to get their candidate elected. One of them will lose.

Think about this. One of them could become the first billion-dollar loser in American political history. He (or she) will not be the last.

The cost of electing and not electing members of Congress will no doubt approach the cost of electing and not electing the next President. But the loss of a billion dollars has a certain ring to it. Someone is going to make history, either in 2012 or 2016, depending on when that billion-dollar figure appears.

The magnitude of a losing campaign that squanders a billion dollars is considerable. It is so huge that even conceptualizing it is difficult. The real cost is the opportunity cost: the cost of the highest value item or items foregone. Here, people debate. What is the highest-value item? There is no agreement.